DOLLS

Just this week, the saga of Civil War smugglers “Lucy Ann” and “Nina” has been attracting a whole lot of bug. It seems that these innocuous ladies were being used as “mules,” back in the 1860s. Like the cocaine traffickers of today, who try to elude border agents and Interpol, these dainty girls were sent forward with instructions to appear innocent, and not get caught. They must have done their job quite well, because it’s only now—almost 150 years later—that these two femmes are being inspected by the Feds.

Who were these girls? And what were their missions? Lucy Ann and Nina are dolls that have been residing in the Museum of the Confederacy, and it is now rumored that their hollowed-out heads were used to smuggle medical supplies to the South, avoiding the prying eyes and hands of Union soldiers and inspectors.

To prove if their heads could have been used as storage cavities, the dolls were sent to the VCU Medical Center, and a series of X-rays were performed on the dolls. The conclusion proves that the dolls did have the physical dimensions and depth for being medical mercenaries. The next step is a stopover at a forensics lab, where technicians will swab and run tests for trace evidence of quinine and morphine.

Many folks—pragmatists—say this is all a bit of drama and hype. They maintain that the papier-mâché heads are just typical of all dolls of that era; there is nothing special about these two creations to establish them as a make-believe Mata Hari or Anna Chapman. For people who tend to romanticize and dream big, these dolls are a gateway into bygone subterfuge and derring-do. It’s heady material, regardless of which way the “head” issue finally gets resolved.

Dolls as a means of hiding in plain sight is nothing new, and it’s been the stuff of legends and novels for many, many years.  The common wisdom is that dolls are so innocent and so pure (except for Chucky, of course) that no one would ever suspect them of nefarious activities. Poor fools! If you’ve read my past blogs (especially the last one, designed for Halloween Hi-Jinx), you know that dolls can be quite devilish and downright evil!

The doll as a conduit for convicted felons and other seedy underworld types was beautifully brought home in “Wait Until Dark,” a huge hit on Broadway and in the movies. In the film version, Audrey Hepburn played the poor damsel in distress, and her peril was worsened by the fact that she was blind and had to fight a cadre of drug dealers who were intent on getting back their stash. Where were the drugs tucked away? In a doll, of course.

Likewise, lovely British actress Emily Mortimer allowed herself to appear frazzled, terrified, and harried in the thriller “Transsiberian.” She and her co-star Woody Harrelson fall in with a bad crowd while riding that fabled Orient Express. They meet up with a pair of worldly thieves and drug pushers, who are transporting their latest score in—drumroll!—a Russian nesting doll. As you can imagine, being sequestered on a train with an illicit doll, a pair of cutthroats, and encountering a driven Ben Kingsley, who is determined to retrieve that doll, can be exhausting and intimidating. It gives the winsome Emily and her erstwhile Woody a run for their lives.

As a doll fancier, and a film lover, I adore these movies that focus on how dolls can play games with our conceptions and misconceptions about life and appearances. It’s always exhilarating to watch a master director and writer take a plot as old as the hills and give it an unexpected twist.

Bookmark

Email This

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (2)

...

Why aren't you posting on Facebook anymore? I like to read it and the comments on that page. What happened that it's not there anymore? Good article, and an interesting way to think about dogs and what they can do.

Bette P. , November 08, 2010

• 
• +0
• 
• 

...

Dolls are still being used to smuggle drugs to this day. People don't expect to find bad things inside such pretty toys. It's a shame. It makes a mockery out of what a doll is supposed to be: pretty and innocent.

Angela , November 05, 2010

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Write comment

Name

Email

Website

Comment

smaller | bigger

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Add Comment Preview